Analysis process of inductive study of John 6:1-2
John 6:1-2, analysis
From the observation of John 6:1-2, we have discovered many hidden things that were not apparent.
The following are the summary of the observation:
1. It took at least four days to get from Jerusalem to the Sea of Galilee
2. Jesus had great multitudes who followed him because Jesus healed all of them
3. Jesus must have gone through Samaria, a shorter route than the normal route that the Jews take, because of the account in John 4.
4. The Samaritans warmly welcomed the multitudes, and Jesus healed and taught there before going over to the Sea of Galilee.
To an in-depth analysis of the passage, you reflect on the observed facts.
1. It took at least four days to get from Jerusalem to the Sea of Galilee.
If it takes at least four days to get from Jerusalem to the Sea of Galilee, why did John left out the details of the journey?
How did the Jews travel in those days?
Why did Jesus travel so much from Jerusalem to the Sea of Galilee to go back to Jerusalem at a later date for the feasts of the Jews?
2. Jesus had great multitudes who followed him because Jesus healed all of them
How do we know that Jesus healed all of them?
Who are these multitudes? Were these multitudes mainly Jews? Were the great multitudes related to one another?
How big were the many multitudes?
What were the interests of these multitudes? Did they work? Why were they in Jerusalem? What caught their attention that they followed Jesus? Where are the twelve disciples of Jesus?
3. Jesus must have gone through Samaria, a shorter route than the usual way that the Jews take, because of the account in John 4.
Did Jesus take the shortest route cutting through Samaria? If he did, why did he do that? What effect did John 4 account of the woman at the well in Samaria have on this journey for Jesus and his disciples? Why did Jews avoid Samaritans? How would a Samaritans react to the Jews hating on them? If the woman at the well in Samaria was the reason for Jesus going through Samaria, did Jesus visit this place often? Then, why did John not record these journeys in detail?
4. The Samaritans warmly welcomed the great multitudes, and Jesus healed and taught there before going over to the Sea of Galilee.
Were the great multitudes the Jews? If they were, why did they go through Samaria following Jesus? If they followed Jesus into Samaria, it must have been their first time in Samaria.
What were the responses of the Jews and Samaritans in their first interaction? What were their prejudices against the Samaritans that were shattered when they come into the town? What did Jesus do in Samaria? If Jesus healed the sick, cast out the demons, and taught in Samaria, what were the responses of the mixed crowd of Jews and Samaritans? Did the Samaritans harbor hate against the Jews that they did not feed or sheltered them or they welcomed the Jews because of Jesus? After this event, did the Jews return to Samaria and visit them, as they have become friends? The Jews who came into Samaria, did they continue to go through Samaria when they go to Jerusalem or did they revert to their old ways of avoiding Samaritans?
These are some of the obvious questions that we can derive from the observation of the passage.
During the analysis phase of the inductive process, the qualities of the questions asked will determine the qualities of the analysis you will do, resulting in quality application and conclusion. When you first begin the analysis phase, your questions might not be as good as you want them to be. There may be many reasons why this may be the case. One of the main reason for it is that you did not spend enough time and energy observing the text. Good observations lead to good analysis.





